The Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe - 875 Words

Take it to the grave In Edgar Allen Poe’s â€Å"the cask of amontillado† we are introduced to the character Montressor who has been wronged by his foe Fortunato. Montressor in response to this offense vows revenge on Fortuanto. With the use of sweet talk and a delicious wine Montressor leads Forutnato into the catacombs where he encloses Fortunato behind a brick wall to die. This series of events and eventual ending begs questions like whether Was he wrong for taking matters into his own hands? And why does Montressor after years and years go by is he confessing to this murder? Does this make Montressor a sociopath? In today’s new age thinking, what transpired between Montressor and Fortunato is completely unacceptable and is punishable by law. Taking the law into your own hands is frowned upon. However, the setting of this story is in 17th century Italy where it was quite easier to get away with murder. More so Montressor states â€Å"The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could† (N108). Montresor from the beginning lets us know that Fortunato has wrong so many times and for a while he tried to let it go but the anger and rage from whatever he did, was building up to the point where he couldn’t take it any longer. Montressor also states â€Å"at length I would be revenged†. His mind was made up and when the opportunity came along, an eye for an eye came to full fruition. Furthermore, this murder was a non- physical murder. He trapped him behind a brick wall to die andShow MoreRelatedThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe992 Words   |  4 Page sEdgar Allen Poe had many pieces of literature, but one in particular â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado† reflected his personality. It is a short story that can be read easily, and can take on many ironies. The several ironies can point to the fact that Poe himself was implanted into the story as he was a mysterious man. There are several characters with different personalities often interpreted as Poe hiding his dark side which would be â€Å"Montresor†. The other personality Fortunato could be that drunken personalityRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe953 Words   |  4 Pagesseek revenge. â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado† is a short story by the American poet, editor and story writer Edgar Allen Poe. This story is a tale of revenge touching on the darker sides of human nature and at what lengths a man will go to achieve vengeance. We are told by our narrator Montresor that he had been insulted by a wealthy wine connoisseur named Fortunato. Montresor picks him out of the carnival and lures him into his wine cellar with promise of a renown sherry wine, Amontillado. Fortunato is baitedRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe1052 Words   |  5 PagesEdgar Allen Poe was one of the most famed authors of death, decay, and depression in the 18th century. Poe started his writing career during the Romantic literature period, a period focused on nature, emotions, and a fascination with the supernatural elements. As writers started to write in this new genre, works started becoming dark, with an eerie feeling and a tone of death. Out of the Romantic era came the sub-classification of the Gothic genre. Poe started to embrace this new genre and his writingsRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe1204 Words   |  5 Pagesbest could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge† (Poe 1). This line draws the reader into the story by bringing up questions like, what insults could have been done to deserve su ch revenge? The uniqueness in the question itself is that it turns the table of a classic mystery or gothic story (Mcgarth). Instead of asking â€Å"who did it,† the question is, â€Å"why did he do it† (Baraban Motive for Murder in Cask of Amontillado ). Montresor uses Fortunato’s strengthens and turns them intoRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe851 Words   |  4 Pagesabout â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado† Do hate someone, but act like they are your best friend to get something that you want from them? Edgar Allen Poe does in his story â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado† as he uses Montresor to tell Fortunato’s journey to catacombs and how he â€Å"conceives and executes an ingenious plan... for revenging† Fortunato (Gruesser 129). In â€Å"The cask of Amontillado† Poe uses tone, plot devices, and the setting to present the theme of appearances masking reality. To begin, Poe uses one toRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe1025 Words   |  5 PagesJared Mourning English II Prof. Platt Thursday, March 3, 2016 Fortunato’s Misfortune In â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado,† Edgar Allen Poe issues a warning that even your closest friends can stab you in the back when you insult them in the right way. Poe perfectly portrays the way someone you think is your best friend could just as well be your biggest enemy. In â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado† Edgar Allen Poe uses Montresor’s point of view, plot, and symbolism to convey the cold, merciless man who is MontresorRead More`` Cask Of Amontillado `` By Edgar Allen Poe1505 Words   |  7 PagesEdgar Allen Poe was a writer who sculpted every detail to create his desired â€Å"theme†. His short stories are mostly representing the murder of a character. The murderer, who is the narrator, explains the plan for the murder. The narrator destroys the humans around him through his destructive mind. The reason for the murder is revenge and hatred. In â€Å"Cask of Amontillado† and â€Å"The Tell-Tale Heart† Poe utilized â€Å"unreliable na rrators,† he even created similarities between murder and victim to establishRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe1492 Words   |  6 Pages McMullen 531-06 1 September 2014 Summer Reading The Cask of Amontillado In The Cask of Amontillado, by Edgar Allen Poe, Montressor is able to successfully manipulate Fortunato s arrogance and pride and use it against him as revenge. Montressor knows that Fortunato has a love for wine. Montressor tells Fortunato that he may have acquired Amontillado, a very nice wine. Montressor is not quite sure if the wine is Amontillado, but since Fotunato appears to be occupied Montressor saysRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado By Edgar Allen Poe1723 Words   |  7 Pages Were Montresor’s action in The Cask of Amontillado justified? Is killing someone justifiable? In Edgar Allen Poe’s short story The Cask of Amontillado that question is one that could be asked. The short story is about a man named Montresor and his quest to get revenge on his foe Fourtando who has apparently insulted Montresor. Around the time of the carnival season Montresor leaves his house to go find Fourtando and get his revenge he tells none of his servants toRead MoreThe Cask Of Amontillado, By Edgar Allen Poe884 Words   |  4 PagesIn â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado,† by Edgar Allen Poe, one finds the horror throughout its pages. The ideas of unexplained revenge and images of scenes only getting darker and colder cause one to have feelings of dread and disbelief. The protagonist, Montresor, has waited fifty years to tell his story, and one has to question the reliability of what he is saying. Questions of true justice and the power of an insult arise, only magnifying those ideas of horror. In â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado ,† one sees a

Advertising A Safe Haven For Children - 1860 Words

Children are targets who advertisers and major companies aim because of the massive influence they have in their parents’ spending trends. Advertisers have noted how effective advertising is to children and have spent nearly twelve billion dollars a year directly marketing products to young children. Everywhere children go, they are bombarded by a constant stream of advertisements in every aspect of their young lives. Advertisements stalk children in any setting, whether it in the comfort of their homes or in schools, with the objective of polluting their minds with the images companies try to convey. Instead of being a safe haven for children, home and school have become the catalyst locations for many advertisers to spread their influence.. Children cannot avoid ads by going home or going to school since it is forced upon them, so advertisers take advantage by putting commercials on television after school and by sponsoring school programs during the day as marketing ploys. What marketers fail to realize in their efforts to make money is the physical and psychological consequences these advertisements have on children. Many of the products advertised by the media play on a child’s developing psyche, which could result in harmful effects in a developing personality and self-image. It takes advantage of a child’s inability to differentiate between a commercial and the persuasive intent in the message. It is pitting intelligent MBA-titled adults against the incrediblyShow MoreRelatedHuman Trafficking : The United States1250 Words   |  5 PagesWhere does your mind wander when someone talks about child trafficking? Do you think of children from third world countries being kidnapped or sold into the black market of human trafficking? Most of us probably think of human trafficking as being an issue that poor countries just have but, that isn’t the case. Human trafficking is alive and sadly thriving in the United States. According to Tr afficking Source Center, 5,544 cases of human trafficking were reported in the United States in 2015. WithRead MoreHealth Law and Regulations Paper1416 Words   |  6 Pagesmedical industry advertising. This form of spending would bring costs down. The purpose of this paper is to take a closer look at the health care regulatory agency, The Center for Disease Control. The Center for Disease Control creates tools to protect the health of people. They educate on prevention of disease, injury and disability. They work on preparing the public for new health threats. They detect and investigate health problems; conduct research to enhance prevention; foster safe and healthfulRead MoreSex Trafficking And Sexual Trafficking1744 Words   |  7 PagesSex trafficking, particularly that of children, has become a growing concern in the United States over the past several decades (Kotrla, 2010). By definition, child sex trafficking is â€Å"when a child (under 18 years of age) is induced to perform a commercial sex act† (U.S., 2013, para. 4), and includes forms such as prostitution and pornography (Kotrla, 2010). Researchers suggest that children are the most vulnerable to becoming victims of prostitution (Kotrla), and it is estima ted that there areRead MoreMoises Gutierrez : A And Safe For Anyone1471 Words   |  6 Pageshomes constantly, while other times they did not live in homes at all. Yet despite their living and financial status, they would constantly live in neighborhoods that were great and safe for anyone. Those neighborhoods would have many other children to play with, and many of the adults were good people, proving a haven for all those within the neighborhood, no matter how much money they are or aren’t making. And it was thanks to these neighborhoods and all those living within that helped Moises GutierrezRead MoreNew Law : Security Enforcement Practices1741 Words   |  7 Pagesshooting will continue to drive other’s to replicate such ruthless behavior. It is mindboggling to evaluate rhetorical research that states that many schools are no longer ‘safe havens’ from violence whether the shots are fired by student gangs and or drug dealers, a demented outsider who targeted a playground full of children or a psychologically distressed being deciding to end the lives of others for the sake of revenge. Haven’t we learned from these massacres that it is in our duty to take actionRead MoreSof-a-Logue Unit 2 Ip Script Mky6511817 Words   |  8 Pagesand how are they approached? The easiest way to ensure a business in the future is to constantly create new customers (Winer amp; Dhar, 2011). By focusing on next generation, children and young adults, we do just that. A current gap in the market is a safe environment for exploration of the internet and socializing by children under 18. By creating this situation, through marketing efforts directed at parents, educators, and directly to the target demographic, Sof-A-Logue becomes the first site a childRead MoreManagement Plan For A Executive Director1714 Words   |  7 Pagesaccount for all money. Figure 4: Stephanie Contreras Finance Director Program Manager Rachel Minter currently fills the Program Manager position. Her responsibilities include managing COPE’s programs: the organization of job resources, providing a safe haven for three weeks, and first aid. She also decides how programs are implemented and what tasks need to be completed. She ensures that all programs follow the mission of COPE (Srinivas, 2015, para. 12). She also conducts outgoing interviews with theRead MoreEssay on Drugs, Money, Media and Advertising1849 Words   |  8 PagesDrugs, Money, Media and Advertising Ads for pharmaceutical drugs are everywhere. They are in magazines, on television and radio, on billboards, and on the little bags that you get from the pharmacist. These days it is difficult to get away from all the drug advertising. All these ads are for products that require a doctors prescription. The goal of advertising is to increase profits. By advertising so heavily for drugs that the majority of the population does not need, pharmaceuticalRead MoreThe Food Industry and Self-Regulation: Standards to Promote Success and to Avoid Public Health Failures7346 Words   |  30 PagesAlthough many forces contribute to obesity and poor diet, food industry behaviors such as marketing unhealthy foods to children, promoting large portions and betweenmeal snacks, and exploiting schools for commercial gain have raised calls for government regulation and paved the path for actions such as requiring calorie labeling in restaurants.4,5 Industry practices affecting children have raised special concern, particularly regarding food marketing.6 According to a recent report by the Federal TradeRead MoreEssay on Green Healthy Lawns and Lots of Toxic Chemicals2352 Words   |  10 Pageswalk dogs, orchestrate lawns, and listen to chirping birds? Yet, spring also brings us a medley of a different sort-a toxic soup of chemicals. Much of this soup isnt thrust upon us from the outside; disturbingly, we choose to expose ourselves, our children, our neighbors, and our pets to these harmful chemicals. In 2013, Americans spent over $700,000,000 on pesticides (cumulatively weighing over sixty-five million pounds) for use on their lawns alone (1). One would think that properly informed humans

Club Med free essay sample

Club Med postponed the launch and wondered if its concept was out of sync with the new reality. The Wanna Play concept had been planned as the theme to drive all other Club Med marketing programs. Wanna Play would encourage adults to add more pleasure to their lives, and involve their children in Club Med’s kids program. But most importantly, it was light-hearted and clear message to customers that Club Med cared about relationships, Vanderslice explained. After President George W. Bush and New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani initiated the first baseball game of the World Series less than two weeks later, Club Med decided the time was right to launch Wanna Play. In difficult times, it’s more important than ever to identify and strengthen your core values, Vanderslice noteed. Short-term results should not preclude long-term brand building. To maintain the success of its rebranding, Club Med follows five principles. We will write a custom essay sample on Club Med or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page (1) Successful branding efforts focus on building relationships. That is why branding goes beyond advertising, which is a monologue. Branding is a dialogue. (2) Successful brands seize extraordinary opportunities created by social and economic change. (3) Successful branding efforts allow both personalization and economies of scale. (4) Brands, by their definition, are differentiated. They express attitude, they tell stories, they resonate with consumers. (5) To be personal, branding cannot be the same everywhere. Club Med, which has 120 villages in 40 countries and five continents, is pursuing a rebranding strategy that is geographically diversified, Vanderslice said. Club Med uses the phrase, global but local. Because branding is about relationship building, the role of the culture is huge. The same service or product may have different benefits to customers who live in different cultures. Vanderslice summarized Club Med’s rebranding philosophy in two words, roots and links. The company is rooted in its original concept, which are the core values of freedom, creativity and spontaneity. Club Med also supports strong links between its villages’ and their guests, which ensure flexible responses to each guest experience and satisfaction.

Spinoza Essay Research Paper This paper will free essay sample

Spinoza Essay, Research Paper This paper will sketch Spinoza s statement in Part 1 of his Ethical motives of substance. He argues that there is merely one substance, which is the same as God, that includes everything in the existence. It will walk through each proposition and explicate his cogent evidence of it, which relies of his declared definitions. This paper will besides explicate the difference between Spinoza s belief of substance and that of Leibniz from his Discourse on Metaphysics. It will so reason that Leibniz s history of the figure of substances superior. Spinoza s first proposition is that substance is by nature prior to its fondnesss ( Cahn p.417 ) . This proposition relies on his definition of a substance which is self created. The fondnesss of the substance, harmonizing to his definition, are things that are created by something else. Since the substance is self-created, the substance must hold created the fondnesss from itself. Therefore, the substance is prior to its fondnesss since the substance has to be in being to make its fondnesss. Proposition 2, two substances holding different properties have nil in common ( Cahn p.417 ) , besides relies on the definition that a substance is self-created. If one property of a substance is created from that substance, it belongs merely to that substance. Therefore, two different substances holding the same property are non different, but the same substance. If two substances are genuinely different, they have none of the same properties. If all the properties of the two substances are wholly different, they have nil in common. One thing, which is wholly different from the other, can non hold caused the other. This is true because something created must hold some cognition of its Godhead, as stated in Spinoza s axiom 4. Since the two different things have nil in common, which includes no cognition of the other, one can non hold created the other. Spinoza states this in proposition 3. When things have nil in common, one can non be the cause of the other ( Cahn p. 417 ) . He besi des reaffirms this in proposition 4 by saying that things are different by the fact of differences in their properties or fondnesss. This fact is seen easy by looking at the proofs beforehand of propositions 1,2, and 3. Proposition 5 and 6 restate earlier propositions in footings of substances, as opposed to things. Proposition 5 provinces: In the existence at that place can non be two or more substances of the same nature or property ( Cahn p.417 ) . Since two substances are distinguished by a difference in their properties or fondnesss ( proposition 4 ) , the substances would non be different from one another if the had the same property. The two substances would be the same. Proposition 6 provinces that One substance can non be produced by another substance ( Cahn p.417 ) . If a substance were to make another one, they would hold something in common such as an property. However, there can non be two substances with the same property ( proposition 5 ) , they must hold different properties and, hence, be different. If the substances are different, they have nil in common ( proposition 2 ) , and substances with nil in common on could non hold caused the other ( proposition3 ) . One substance can non make another. Spinoza has proved all this about a substance, but has non proved that substance exists. In proposition 7 he does: Existence belongs to the nature of substance ( Cahn p. 418 ) . He states that since substance is self-caused, being is needfully involved in it kernel, intending that being is portion of its nature. Now that substance exists, Spinoza proves it is infinite. He says that if substance were finite, it would be limited by another substance with the same property of being. But no two substances can hold the same property ( proposition 5 ) . Therefore, substance is infinite. Since Spinoza has proved that there is a alone, infinite substance that exists, he now goes on to turn out that the substance is God, merely one of which exists. He must first include some propositions, which will be used subsequently to assist turn out this point. He begins by turn outing that the more existent something is, the more properties it has ( proposition 9 ) . He feels that this proposition is apparent in the definition of an property: that which the mind perceives of substance as representing its being ( Cahn p.416 ) . The more world that is associated with the kernel of a substance the more properties it has because an property is what the mind perceives the kernel of the substance to be. The substance itself must gestate each of these properties ( proposition 10 ) . Harmonizing to definition 3, gestating a substance does non necessitate the construct of something else with which to organize the substance. Besides, gestating something is based on its kernel. Therefore, attributes used to gestate a substance must be conceived through itself. Now Spinoza proves that God exists in proposition 11: God, or substance consisting of infinite properties, each of which expresses ageless and infinite kernel, needfully exists ( Cahn p.419 ) . He easy proves this utilizing axiom 7: if a thing can be conceived as non bing, its kernel does non affect being ( Cahn p.416 ) . He says it is absurd to gestate God as nonexistent since being belongs to the nature of God, or substance ( proposition 7 ) . He besides says that there is no substance that can turn out that God does non be since two different substances have nil in common ( proposition 2 ) . Therefore, God exists. Now that Spinoza has proved that the infinite substance of God exists, he proves that substance can non be divided in proposition 12. He that if it were divided, each portion would be infinite, self-caused, and would hold to hold different properties, doing several different substances to be caused from the one substance which is impossible because no substance can be caused from another ( proposition 6 ) . Proposition affirms that an perfectly infinite substance is indivisible ( Cahn p.421 ) . It is impossible to split an perfectly infinite substance because several substances would be with the same properties, which is impossible harmonizing to proposition 5. Spinoza now proves proposition 14 ; that no other substance other than God exists. Since God is an perfectly infinite being, any other existing substance would hold to exhibit an property of God. This is impossible because no two substances can be with the same property ( proposition 5 ) . Being is an property of God ; hence no other substance can be. Leibniz s place on substance differs form that of Spinoza in the figure of substances. Leibniz does non believe in one substance, but in many substances, or as he calls them monads. He believes that everything is made up of monads with their ain properties. These monads are in harmoniousness throughout the existence, neer coming in contact. He believes that anything thing that consists of monads with the same properties are non different, but the same, similar to the belief of Spinoza. The lone difference is the figure of substances. Leibniz s history of the figure of substances is superior. The many monads, each with its ain properties, allows for the many different things in the existence to be. Since everything does non hold all the same monads, they can be different. A Canis familiaris and a stone are evidently non the same. They are non the same because they are composed of monads with different properties. If they did consist of the same monads, they would be the same, and they evidently are non. Harmonizing to Spinoza, God is the lone substance. Everything we know is portion of God. God includes all properties. If I am portion of God, I contain all properties. However, I do non incorporate all properties. There are many that I do non include such and eternity. I am evidently non infinite. Leibniz s history of the figure of substances allows me to be, non incorporating every property. Bibliography Cahn, Stephen M. , ed. , Classics of Western Philosophy ( Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. , 1999 ) 416-421. This paper will sketch Spinoza s statement in Part 1 of his Ethical motives of substance. He argues that there is merely one substance, which is the same as God, that includes everything in the existence. It will walk through each proposition and explicate his cogent evidence of it, which relies of his declared definitions. This paper will besides explicate the difference between Spinoza s belief of substance and that of Leibniz from his Discourse on Metaphysics. It will so reason that Leibniz s history of the figure of substances superior. Spinoza s first proposition is that substance is by nature prior to its fondnesss ( Cahn p.417 ) . This proposition relies on his definition of a substance which is self created. The fondnesss of the substance, harmonizing to his definition, are things that are created by something else. Since the substance is self-created, the substance must hold created the fondnesss from itself. Therefore, the substance is prior to its fondnesss since the substance has to be in being to make its fondnesss. Proposition 2, two substances holding different properties have nil in common ( Cahn p.417 ) , besides relies on the definition that a substance is self-created. If one property of a substance is created from that substance, it belongs merely to that substance. Therefore, two different substances holding the same property are non different, but the same substance. If two substances are genuinely different, they have none of the same properties. If all the properties of the two substances are wholly different, they have nil in common. One thing, which is wholly different from the other, can non hold caused the other. This is true because something created must hold some cognition of its Godhead, as stated in Spinoza s axiom 4. Since the two different things have nil in common, which includes no cognition of the other, one can non hold created the other. Spinoza states this in proposition 3. When things have nil in common, one can non be the cause of the other ( Cahn p. 417 ) . He besi des reaffirms this in proposition 4 by saying that things are different by the fact of differences in their properties or fondnesss. This fact is seen easy by looking at the proofs beforehand of propositions 1,2, and 3. Proposition 5 and 6 restate earlier propositions in footings of substances, as opposed to things. Proposition 5 provinces: In the existence at that place can non be two or more substances of the same nature or property ( Cahn p.417 ) . Since two substances are distinguished by a difference in their properties or fondnesss ( proposition 4 ) , the substances would non be different from one another if the had the same property. The two substances would be the same. Proposition 6 provinces that One substance can non be produced by another substance ( Cahn p.417 ) . If a substance were to make another one, they would hold something in common such as an property. However, there can non be two substances with the same property ( proposition 5 ) , they must hold different properties and, hence, be different. If the substances are different, they have nil in common ( proposition 2 ) , and substances with nil in common on could non hold caused the other ( proposition3 ) . One substance can non make another. Spinoza has proved all this about a substance, but has non proved that substance exists. In proposition 7 he does: Existence belongs to the nature of substance ( Cahn p. 418 ) . He states that since substance is self-caused, being is needfully involved in it kernel, intending that being is portion of its nature. Now that substance exists, Spinoza proves it is infinite. He says that if substance were finite, it would be limited by another substance with the same property of being. But no two substances can hold the same property ( proposition 5 ) . Therefore, substance is infinite. Since Spinoza has proved that there is a alone, infinite substance that exists, he now goes on to turn out that the substance is God, merely one of which exists. He must first include some propositions, which will be used subsequently to assist turn out this point. He begins by turn outing that the more existent something is, the more properties it has ( proposition 9 ) . He feels that this proposition is apparent in the definition of an property: that which the mind perceives of substance as representing its being ( Cahn p.416 ) . The more world that is associated with the kernel of a substance the more properties it has because an property is what the mind perceives the kernel of the substance to be. The substance itself must gestate each of these properties ( proposition 10 ) . Harmonizing to definition 3, gestating a substance does non necessitate the construct of something else with which to organize the substance. Besides, gestating something is based on its kernel. Therefore, attributes used to gestate a substance must be conceived through itself. Now Spinoza proves that God exists in proposition 11: God, or substance consisting of infinite properties, each of which expresses ageless and infinite kernel, needfully exists ( Cahn p.419 ) . He easy proves this utilizing axiom 7: if a thing can be conceived as non bing, its kernel does non affect being ( Cahn p.416 ) . He says it is absurd to gestate God as nonexistent since being belongs to the nature of God, or substance ( proposition 7 ) . He besides says that there is no substance that can turn out that God does non be since two different substances have nil in common ( proposition 2 ) . Therefore, God exists. Now that Spinoza has proved that the infinite substance of God exists, he proves that substance can non be divided in proposition 12. He that if it were divided, each portion would be infinite, self-caused, and would hold to hold different properties, doing several different substances to be caused from the one substance which is impossible because no substance can be caused from another ( proposition 6 ) . Proposition affirms that an perfectly infinite substance is indivisible ( Cahn p.421 ) . It is impossible to split an perfectly infinite substance because several substances would be with the same properties, which is impossible harmonizing to proposition 5. Spinoza now proves proposition 14 ; that no other substance other than God exists. Since God is an perfectly infinite being, any other existing substance would hold to exhibit an property of God. This is impossible because no two substances can be with the same property ( proposition 5 ) . Being is an property of God ; hence no other substance can be. Leibniz s place on substance differs form that of Spinoza in the figure of substances. Leibniz does non believe in one substance, but in many substances, or as he calls them monads. He believes that everything is made up of monads with their ain properties. These monads are in harmoniousness throughout the existence, neer coming in contact. He believes that anything thing that consists of monads with the same properties are non different, but the same, similar to the belief of Spinoza. The lone difference is the figure of substances. Leibniz s history of the figure of substances is superior. The many monads, each with its ain properties, allows for the many different things in the existence to be. Since everything does non hold all the same monads, they can be different. A Canis familiaris and a stone are evidently non the same. They are non the same because they are composed of monads with different properties. If they did consist of the same monads, they would be the same, and they evidently are non. Harmonizing to Spinoza, God is the lone substance. Everything we know is portion of God. God includes all properties. If I am portion of God, I contain all properties. However, I do non incorporate all properties. There are many that I do non include such and eternity. I am evidently non infinite. Leibniz s history of the figure of substances allows me to be, non incorporating every property. Bibliography Cahn, Stephen M. , ed. , Classics of Western Philosophy ( Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. , 1999 ) 416-421.